What drives Tibetan protesters to self-immolate?

Tibet was an independent country prior to being forcefully annexed by China in 1950

Why are Tibetans burning themselves to death?

No single profile unites those who have set themselves on fire, but a look at where they did it reveals common threads

Jamphel Yeshi, the 27-year-old now close to death in an Indian hospital after setting himself on fire in Delhi, is in many ways typical of the 30 or so Tibetans who have over the past 13 months committed self-immolation.

Like many of them, he is in his 20s and comes from the eastern parts of the historical area of Tibet, outside the current “Tibetan Autonomous Region”. But unlike most of them, he is a layman, not a monk or nun, and he was already in exile.

A Tibetan woman cries after Jampa Yeshi self-immolated during a protest in New Delhi, India. Photograph: Tsering Topgyal/AP

Three other recent cases offer further insights into those committing self-immolation, but there is no single profile to unite them: Tsering Kyi was a20-year-old school student of nomad origins from a small village near the town of Machu in Gansu province. Jamyang Palden was a 34-year-old monk at the monastery in Rebkong or Tongren county, also in the eastern Tibetan zone. Sonam Dhargyal was a 44-year-old farmer from Rebkong. Each of them followed their own path to self-immolation.

Kyi and Palden are described by relatives and friends as bright, confident and outgoing. Palden was hearty and funny, according to friends, as well as being a big fan of traditional wrestling. Kyi too was described as popular and lively.

Dhargyal in contrast comes across as more troubled. Taciturn and withdrawn, he was a deeply religious “man of few words”, according to a teacher near Dharamasala who knew him well.

Dhargyal was “far from rich”, one acquaintance said, and struggled to provide for a disabled 18-year-old son and a seriously ill wife.

As with others who become involved in extreme acts of political or religious violence, searching for personal traits or clues in their lifestyle to explain their actions may be the wrong approach. Mapping the places where the incidents have occurred – almost all within a short distance from the self-immolators’ homes – may be more helpful.

What then becomes clear is how these events have largely clustered in a few specific areas.

This can in part be attributed to environmental factors such as where repression by the authorities has been particularly acute and also where a marginally more permissive regime allows freer access to the internet and thus higher levels of awareness of protest elsewhere.

Zones where nomad populations have been resettled in urban centres in large numbers also feature strongly, as do places where there have been newly intensified attempts to regulate religious and cultural life.

But the most significant factor may at first glance be harder to perceive. Tsering Kyi was at a specific school which had become a key centre of unrest. Jamphel Yeshi was living in the highly politicised exile community in Delhi and was a committed activist.

The monastery which was home to Palden is also a major centre of protest and has been for decades. It is closely linked to the Kirti monastery which alone has been the largest single source of the self-immolators.

Dhargyal lived close to Palden’s monastery and may even have been a friend of the monk. As those studying other forms of extremist spectacular violence have found, such acts are part of a culture that becomes established in a given institution or community, often on a very small scale.

A momentum is generated leading to the spread of that particular form of behaviour, encouraged by the support of peers, elders and others. The local reaction to each death, rather than the international reaction, either encourages or discourages others.

Endorsement and example flows through social networks. For the moment, the self-immolators are seen as tragic but admirable martyrs worthy of the pride of their friends and family. There are likely to be many more of them.

Jason Burke

Tibetan Self-Immolations

Numerous Tibetans, mostly monks, have set themselves on fire in the past months as a way to protest the repressive rule of the Chinese government. The Dalai Lama has stated that he does not encourage his people to continue to protest in such drastic ways. At the same time, Beijing has responded with added security measures and arrests. However, the self-immolations continue with no end in sight.

Be the first to start a conversation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 346 other followers

%d bloggers like this: